12/30/2008

Did Mickey Rourke Just Torpedo His Oscar Chances With Ugly Diss At Sean Penn?

Oof, is Mickey Rourke his own worst enemy and back to his old tricks? Could it possibly be a smear campaign?

An ugly rumor has started over at DailyBeast (via Vulture) which is sure to get some traction. According to an alleged text message that the website acquired, Rourke was trashing actor Sean Penn's performance in "Milk," calling the thespian "average" and a "homophobe."

Backstage at Letterman on December 23, Rourke was purportedly overheard as saying about Penn, “I’m not even sure he’ll get a nomination.”

An "L.A. entertainment honcho" apparently shared a text message with DailyBeast writer Gerald Posner and the msg wrote, “Look Sean's an old friend of mine and i didn't buy his performance at all—thought he did an average pretend acting like he was gay besides hes one of the most homophobic people i kno" [sic]

These are some pretty big allegations and we don't really follow the Daily Beast at all, but it is a news website published by Tina Brown, former editor of Vanity Fair and The New Yorker, so it most likely has standards well above most Internet sewer gossip sites (plenty of people are going to scoff here, but would you trust those two sources over your average blog? You should).

Rourke might be contrite in several interviews about his past, but he's not necessarily
been keeping his mouth shut, having already apologized once for homophobic slurs he aimed at a reporter who alleged he had been dating his 'Wrestler' co-star Evan Rachel Wood.

There's a big Mickey fanbase out there, that's as vociferous as David Fincher fanatics, so we imagine a lot of Internet commenters are going to rush to Rourke's defense. While we have no clue what happened we read this very interesting Esquire feature about Rourke recently and it was pretty damaging. Essentially the piece is a first hand account about a writer who interviewed Rourke at his worst, how he loves him in "The Wrestler," but how he feels deep down that the troubled actor will always be a self-centered douchebag.

"Let's put this on the table right away: As far as I'm concerned, Mickey Rourke is a schmuck in the old-school sense -- a squinting organ, a thing that feels but doesn't think. A permanently wounded beast, a scar with legs. At best.

I know this because I saw the Mick at the bottom of the barrel late in 1994, spent two weeks trying to profile him while he was shooting a direct-to-video piece of crap with Tupac Shakur. That he treated me like dirt was no big deal and no surprise, but he also made a point of bad-mouthing his estranged (and now ex) wife, urging me -- unprompted and at length -- to smear her. He stank of both self-pity and braggadocio, and his effluvium of bullshit made it impossible to tell where the lies ended and the lunacy began."
And that proves what exactly? Absolutely nothing, but it's read the whole piece cause it's really interesting and it's enough to make us raise our eyebrows and worry that these allegations might be true and that the talented come back kid might have fucked himself over again by opening his big mouth.

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

Wow I can't believe you would post this crap.Unbelievable.

Penn Supporter said...

I can totally believe this, Mickey still has major issues.

cirkusfolk said...

Found this blurb online today...

Aronofsky teased Professor Brown's NYU Movies 101 class Wednesday night when he told them that there is a cut scene in which Rourke has a complete breakdown in his bathroom. He said that it was one of the greatest filmed acting performances ever (!), and it was so disturbing, he felt the film would be weighed down as a result. When asked if the scene will be included on the DVD, Aronofsky replied, “No. No one except me and Mickey will ever have this scene on DVD. When Mickey learned that the scene was cut, he didn’t talk to me for two weeks.”

Makes me wonder if it was really that good or not. I mean, why cut it then?

The Playlist said...

super interesting. got a link? that would be a good post.

Anonymous said...

Sean Penn is an idiot.

Anonymous said...

How ridiculous. There are plenty who would love nothing more than to sabotage Rourke's resurrection (you among them). If you'd bothered to actually read the Esquire article all the way through, you would see that the author wound up saying how WRONG he was about Rourke, that his performance in The Wrestler deserved not just an Oscar, but a Nobel Prize. Like it or not, he's just been nominated by the Academy for an Oscar. I for one, hope he gets it.

The Playlist said...

i read the entire article, he said Mickey was an incredible actor and deserved the Oscar, which i agree with. What the author was saying and that i was point out was that Rourke is a shmuck through and through. having friends who live in Miami where Rourke does, i've heard stories and let's just say, he's still no angel.

Anonymous said...

Yeah, but no one is an angel. Especially not, idk, Penn for example. So, that is redundant, whether or not Rourke is an angel.

The Playlist said...

Sure, i coulda said more and from some brief personal experience, but i wont. Anyhow, im not calling Rourke's talents into question at all is what i'm saying. And hey, i didn't say it was true, i'm just saying it seemed possible. not sure i think so anymore.

Related Posts with Thumbnails