12/07/2009

Is Mel Gibson's Mystery Project 'The Drowner'?

The governor of Veracruz, Mexico, Fidel Herrara has announced that Mel Gibson is set to return to the region in early 2010 to work on his next film. In January, part of the Ignacio Allende prison will be emptied, says Herrara, "because a grand production will be filmed there with our friend, the actor and producer Mel Gibson."

Gibson previously worked in Veracruz when directing his 2006 film "Apocalypto", and earlier this year he donated $1 million to the region and neighboring Chiapas to help replace storm damaged homes. Clearly, he loves the place.

While most outlets, in a rush to get the story up, have framed the production as being "a mystery," a visit to IMDB and a quick Google search later, leads us to believe the film is most likely "The Drowner."

Being produced by Gibson's Icon Productions in association with new kids on the block, Impian Films, "The Drowner" is based on the award winning novel by Robert Drewe about an engineer in the late 1880s. Here's the synopsis:
In Drewe's historical novel of Australia, Will Dance is an engineer in the 1880s, descended from a line of "drowners", men who irrigate dry lands. While at the public baths, Will swims into the love of his life, actress Angelica Lloyd, and together they travel to dusty western Australia, where Will succeeds in conveying water uphill 35 miles from its source. While experiencing the rough-and-tumble outback, gold rush mania, and a typhoid outbreak, they meet such characters as Axel Boehm, a photographer and chronicler; Inez, a bankrupt socialite turned nurse; Felix Locke, an undertaker with a poetic soul, whose longing for companionship is thwarted by the stigma of his profession.
According to the film's official website (last updated a while ago), "Mel Gibson, Cate Blanchett, Liam Neeson, James McEvoy and Emily Blunt are some of the cast already, or about to be, approached." We're pretty sure most, if not all of that cast is probably old news (and we'd be surprised if all of those names managed to be kept under wraps for this long, though that would be one helluva ensemble). However, over at Impian's own website, while casting news is nowhere to be found, a production start date of 2010 is listed. In addition, it's noted that John Collee ("Master & Commander," "Happy Feet," "Creation") has adapted the screenplay.

Our money is on "The Drowner" being the "mystery project" Gibson is working on. Mexico is probably a much cheaper alternative to shooting a period picture in the Australian outback, and given Gibson's familiarity and history shooting in the area, Icon is probably being given all kinds of incentives to bring their production to the state.

Now, whether or not Gibson will be in front or behind the camera (or both) remains to be seen, but with the actor/director heading there in a just a few weeks time, you can expect news of the film to come quickly.

Jim Sheridan Chats New Projects, Says 'Dreamhouse' Is Next

With "Brothers" barely a week into its theatrical release (btw, we really liked it), director Jim Sheridan is ready to talk about he's working on next. The dudes over at Dark Horizons managed to get the director to chat about the handful of projects that his name has been attached to over the past little while to sort out the wheat from the chaff.

So, here's the quick rundown and you can read the complete details right here:

"Dreamhouse" - This is the next one that's going to go in front of cameras, and Sheridan hopes to get things rolling in February (which pretty much means he's not going to be hosting any Oscar cocktail parties for "Brothers"). As we previously reported, the psychological thriller will star Daniel Craig and is about a family who move to a house in a small New England town and find out it was the scene of a murder. It's scripted by relative unknown David Loucka, who also wrote the 1989 Michael Keaton comedy "The Dream Team." It's a straight up genre flick, but let's hope it's not strictly a cash project like "Get Rich Or Die Tryin'."

"I, Claudius" - Based on the classic 1934 novel by Robert Graves, and best known as a sprawling ten-part BBC production, Sheridan is still eager to bring this to the big screen. He's finished a script, but he still needs to tweak it and get some actors on board. Even though the film takes place in Ancient Rome, as most of the sets are interiors, cost actually won't be too much of an issue. However, making it engaging for audiences who will need the story wrapped up in two hours instead of two weeks, will pose a challenge but Sheridan talks of Claudius being a bit more "proactive" in his version.

"Black Mass" - The story of the famously ruthless Whitey Bulger who built up the Winter Hill Gang is an Irish gangster flick that Sheridan is "working on."

"Sheriff Street" - Sheridan's dream project based on his experiences growing up in Ireland has been kicking around for a while, but needs financial backing before it can get off the ground.

"Emerald City" - Another Irish gangster flick , this time based in New York's Hell Kitchen, is a project that Sheridan has "chilled out on." We guess that unless you're Martin Scorsese, one gangster flick on the go at a time, is enough.

"Ikiru" - "No, not happening." THANK GOD. The remake of Akira Kurosawa's fable about an aging bureaucrat whose perspective on life changes after being diagnosed with cancer, has long bounced around Hollywood, with names like Steven Spielberg and Tom Hanks being attached at one point (::shudder::). The original is fantastic, but doesn't need to be put through the Hollywood schmaltz machine or be scored to U2. We're kind of glad Sheridan is walking away from it.

So there you have it, now will someone please rundown the list of "attached" projects with Ridley Scott and David Fincher too?

'The Hobbit' To Begin Casting This Week, Every Role Except Gandalf Up For Grabs With Eye On Untapped Talent

In news that quashes pretty much every casting rumor about "The Hobbit" thus far, executive producer Peter Jackson has revealed that the casting process for the Guillermo Del Toro helmed two parter will officially begin this week with a wide net and an emphasis on finding untapped talent.

“We’re auditioning for every role,” Jackson explains. "What we’ve done over the years is discover a lot of interesting actors, like Orlando Bloom (in "Lord Of The Rings"), Kate Winslet (in "Heavenly Creatures"), Saoirse Ronan (in "The Lovely Bones"). So if you start looking and auditioning seriously, it’s amazing what incredible talent you’ll find out there.

“(These movies) have never been a star-driven vehicle. The star is (author J.R.R.) Tolkien and the world he created. We are not under any pressure. We want to find the right people. Casting someone to portray a hobbit is not as easy as you might imagine. They have to have a particular type of physical appearance and a sensibility. And the same with an elf or a dwarf. These are fantastical characters, but you’ve got to find the right people to play them, the right humans to translate these characters.”

Ever since the film was announced, actors linked to roles have included the likes of David Tennant, Michael Sheen, Daniel Radcliffe and James McAvoy for the lead role of Bilbo Baggins; Brian Cox as the hobbit, Gimli; and, one we wish had some truth to it, Tom Waits as an unknown hobbit. Most of which are now seemingly nothing more than wildfire rumors if Jackson and Del Toro are truly out for talent and compatibility, not name actors.

Jackson furthers adds that "apart from Ian McKellen, who we obviously want to return as Gandalf, we are not really offering any roles to anybody until we’ve done a casting sweep."

Don't be too fooled though, in this day and age, names still mean a lot, especially for a film that doesn't have the go-ahead yet.

If we were a betting man, we'd probably put our money on Del Toro staple Doug Jones joining McKellen in some form or another. From the original franchise though, Viggo Mortensen has already expressed interest in reprising his role of Aragorn though that is dependent on if his character is included in the unfinished script for the second film, Hugo Weaving was reportedly name dropped by Del Toro as a returning cast member but the actor later revealed he had heard no such thing while Andy Serkis was discussed early on but hasn't been mentioned since.

Maybe actor Stuart T
ownsend will make good? He was originally set to play Aragorn and then was let-go just a few weeks before shooting began (Peter Jackson seems to have a bad habit of doing this, using the same, "oh, we misjudged and he was too young," excuse with Ryan Gosling during the 2007 shoot of "The Lovely Bones"). Maybe not. Townsend sounded rather bitter about his last-minute dismissal and said he was "shafted up the ass," by the filmmakers when he spoke to EW a few years ago.

As Jackson reiterated last week, the project has still yet to receive the studio's greenlight but plans on shooting by summer 2010.

“We were always planning to shoot around April or May next year, and as far as I’m aware, we’re pretty much on target for that. It depends on how quickly the studio greenlights the film. It’s not in our hands. But as long as we‘re shooting next year, we’re fine.”

The first and second installments of "The Hobbit" are tentatively set for respective Christmas releases in 2011 and 2012 which will mark two years of Jackson-dominated festive cinema - the first two films in his and Steven Spielberg's "Tintin" planned trilogy are also targeting Christmas 2011 and 2012 releases.

Producer Says Tim Burton And Johnny Depp's 'Dark Shadows' To Start Shooting Next Fall

Producer Graham King has revealed to SciFiWire that Tim Burton's planned film adaptation of 1960's gothic television soap opera "Dark Shadows" with Johnny Depp attached is set to begin filming in the fall of next year.

"We're actually going to shoot that film next September/October with Tim Burton and Johnny," King revealed. "We've been working on the script a lot, even though he's working on ["Alice In Wonderland"]. We've been given a script. John August wrote the first screenplay. We're making some changes, but the film's going to be in production, as I say, September or October of next year."

On contributing to current fad of vampires in film, King reportedly notes that Burton's film "would have something to say in the post-"Twilight" emo vampire world" concluding that "this is going to be Tim Burton and Johnny doing a vampire movie, right?" He has a point though, as tiresome as we are growing of the Depp-Burton working relationship, Depp as a vampire with Burton behind the camera might actually have something interesting to say in the world of glittery, non-threatening bloodsuckers today.

So what does this mean for Depp's handful of other projects? Rob Marshall's "Pirates Of The Caribbean: On Stranger Tides" and Depp's potential team up with Angelina Jolie in "The Tourist" will probably shoot before "Dark Shadows" in 2010. If Depp really is in contention, we suspect Martin Scorsese's Frank Sinatra biopic won't begin until at least 2011 (though no lead has been cast), after 'Shadows' as would be the case on his newly-linked "Seven Friends Of Pancho Villa and the Woman With Six Fingers" with Emir Kusturica; and that still leaves the likes of "The Incredible Mr. Limpet," "The Lone Ranger," a we-desperately-wish Carol Channing biopic that will likely never happen and probably a few others that escapes us on Depp's plate. Suffice to say, his going to be a busy for the next year or two, but looking at that list, you can be sure that at least one or two of those will fall by the wayside (and Depp is certainly not confirmed for "Sinatra" either). And hey, just cause a producer says a film is going to shoot at in a certain period, with a high-in-demand star like Johnny Depp, anything can happen.

Jamie Bell No-Showed On The First Day Of Production On Tom Ford's 'A Single Man'?

In an interview with Collider, designer-turned-director Tom Ford has coyly discussed how an unnamed actor quietly abandoned the production of his stunning debut feature film, "A Single Man" on its first day events which led to the inspired casting of young British actor Nicholas Hoult.

While it wasn't the first time the issue was brought up, Ford continues to refuse to name the actor, presumably out of respect. Unfortunately for Ford, and the actor in question, early announcements of the film's development and production reveal that the aforementioned actor was very likely fellow Brit, Jamie Bell.


"He didn’t show up the first day that he was due and he’s a well known actor," Ford recounts. "I’m not going to say his name. He was attached for six months and we’d made his costumes. Yes. But again it was so lucky and I cannot imagine anyone else in that role but Nicholas Hoult. I had seen Nicholas’s tape a few weeks earlier and similar to running into Colin at that premiere in London I was kind of thinking to myself, I had a sick feeling inside that this guy was perfect for it and that I was working with another actor. It just came together."

Hoult ended up giving a great performance, so the events that transpired probably turned out all the better for the parties involved, with Bell presumably dropping out of the acclaimed film to take on the motion-captured title role in Steven Spielberg and Peter Jackson's "The Adventures Of Tintin: The Secret Of The Unicorn" (on which the actor himself was a replacement for Thomas Sangster).

Interestingly, Ford also addresses the rumor that Colin Firth, whose performance in "A Single Man" is rightfully garnering award season talk, was only cast after another unnamed and truly unknown actor dropped out. Ford swears Firth was his first choice, though recounted that he "jumped on a plane and flew from New Mexico where I was to London" for a "handshake deal" when the opportunity arose. Nevertheless, how Ford, Firth and Hoult must be counting their lucky stars now.

Best Of The Decade: The Playlist's Best Films Of 2005

Aka the year where we celebrate *every* movie released.

Here's our 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 picks.

In creating and arguing over all our lists, 2005 was easily the most difficult year (yes, we're going to say that about every year) and it's perhaps fitting that the mid-way point of the decade yielded the best crop of pictures. We could have easily listed 20 films here, but once again, stuck to 10, uh sort of... (and since we've saved documentaries for another feature, it helps give us breathing room).

Yeah, we did more than 10 this year. Sue us, or get your own site. Globally, the Dardenne brothers would win their second Palme d'Or of the decade at the Cannes Film Festival ("L'Enfant" which wouldn't be released in the U.S. until the following year), Michael Haneke would win Best Director (for "Cache") and Jim Jarmusch's "Broken Flowers" would win the runner-up Grand Prix. Elsewhere, at the Oscars the American cinematic world would be forever embarrassed that Paul Haggis' "Crash" would win Best Picture, snubbing the sure-to-be winner "Brokeback Mountain," but Ang Lee would at least win Best Director.

At the box-office, it was the same ol', same ol', and the top three grossing-films were big, adventure fantasy films, "Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire," "Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith," and "The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe," (which is ironic, because the studio basically canceled further additions of this series as it was evidently too expensive).

A Pregnant Amy Adams Won't Appear In John Hillcoat's 'Promised Land'

Ahh, nuts. Just when we thought John Hillcoat was amassing a stellar cast for his adaptation of the depression-era bootleggers brothers tale, "The Wettest County In The World," now called, "The Promised Land," it appears the director has been met with a bump in the road.

Amy Adams, who was set to play one of the female leads — the paramour of one of the Bondurant brothers featured in the story — is evidently pregnant now and confirmed to Collider that she's going to be taking some time off and won't resume acting work until the summer of 2010.

Hillcoat's 'Promised Land' is supposed to start shooting in February, so unless that date has changed, presumably she's dropped the role. "I just finished 'The Fighter,' with David O. Russell," she said. "And then, I’m taking some time off right now. I’m not sure [how long]. Probably until next summer."

That is unfortunate, but it still appears that Hillcoat at least has Ryan Gosling and Shia LaBeouf to play two of the three brothers. Other actor's names who were once thrown around were
Scarlett Johansson, Paul Dano and Michael Shannon and it's unclear if they're still in talks or what, but Shannon would be perfect. Johansson was presumably the red-head role Adams was going to take, but she's out of the picture one would think?

We read the script, written by Nick Cave, a few weeks ago and with Adams out, we still think Christina Hendricks of "Mad Men" would be a strong candidate, as the character is supposed to be somewhat of a buxomy red-head.

Review: 'Crazy Heart' Is A Shaggy Dog Worth Loving

Jeff Bridges, sporting shaggy, shoulder-length hair and a matching salt-and-pepper beard and speaking in a marbleized Texas drawl, doesn't so much consume "Crazy Heart," his terrific new honky tonk drama, as much as is the movie.

Bridges plays Bad Blake, a country singer of some forgotten prominence who now bounces around the Southwest playing gigs in shitty little clubs and bars. He's a (barely) functioning alcoholic who pukes before shows and whose life now consists of banging old lady groupies and watching Spanish soap operas in the fleabag motels of each small town he visits. Recently Blake achieved a moderate amount of success by mentoring and writing songs for a hot young country star Tommy Sweet (Colin Farrell), who has already far eclipsed Bad Blake's fame.

While in Santa Fe, a young reporter named Jean (Maggie Gyllenhaal) interviews him. This is a nice little device to get some of Bad Blake's background (but only as much as he's willing to share), and soon enough a romantic relationship blossoms between those two. Of course, you're thinking, they'll get together. The relationship does eventually blossom in an organic and engaging way — she's looking for a father figure as much as she's looking for a sturdy man — but the biggest sticking point of the film is how quickly their romance initially flourishes as it feels a little hurried. Why would she fall for this boozing, overweight has-been? Well, that's slowly revealed, and it's a testament to the performances that you start to believe in this pair quicker than you'd imagine.

Even though it's an underdog story, one that has the familiar (sometimes predictable) story beats that make the genre a hallmark, writer-director Scott Cooper (adapting the novel by Thomas Cobb) is much more interested in characters than forward momentum. For the first half of the movie, this may seem like a detriment, but by the emotionally charged second half, you understand that the movie had to take its own, ambling time. Because that's the way Bad Blake would have told it. So, "Crazy Heart" doesn't sell itself completely well in the first half and it feels like an above-average CMT movie initially. But then, that second-half kicks in, and the bottle is drained and we're left with emotionally naked and powerful stuff that truly makes you a believer. "Crazy Heart" earns its pain and that's nice to see.

Even Blake's triumphs are tinged with melancholy and Cooper's plainspoken visual style, which combines postcard-worthy vistas of the surrounding environment with loving close-ups of the actors' faces, gorgeously translates this. There's a shot of Bridges, who is looking down, and the scrunched-up lines on his forehead (there seem to be a million of them) just says it all. All of the characters (even Robert Duvall's jolly bar owner) have pain in their lives, and part of the magic of the movie is watching them slowly free themselves from that anguish.

It doesn't hurt that the music, by Stephen Burton and soundtrack czar T. Bone Burnett, is so fucking good. We only hear a handful of Bad Blake's classics (at first this seems like a letdown but then it makes perfect sense — these are the only songs that people want him to play, over and over again), but they're all toe-tapping gems. The titular song, which he conceives as the movie goes along (he can't finish it until he gets his shit together), is gorgeous and heartfelt and absolutely wonderful. It's very similar in spirit to Bruce Springsteen's weary "The Wrestler" theme, but if this song gets equally snubbed by Oscar it will be a travesty.

But back to Bridges. For almost his entire career he's flown under the radar, delivering amazing character actor performances from underneath a boyish movie star face. In recent years, however, with his good looks fading under a mess of wrinkles and facial hair, he has freed himself and given us some of his career-best work. Even if he just pops up for a few minutes, like when he was growling at Robert Downey Jr. from inside a mechanized behemoth in "Iron Man," he steals the shows and totally brings his characters to life. In "Crazy Heart," he delivers one of the performances of his career. But the miraculous thing is that, like Mickey Rourke in last year's "Wrestler," his performance feels effortlessly natural. It's a towering achievement and something that Bridges just seems to inhabit. Everything about Bad Blake, from the way he shuffles down a garish Texas mall to how he wears his sunglasses, is so fully realized that you absolutely feel for him. This isn't about being dazzled by a performance, although there is that too, it's about being connected, 100% with a character. It's wonderfully soulful, three-dimensional acting and yes, as you've heard it's very likely going to win Bridges an Oscar nomination (plus he's been overlooked so many times now — four times — it stands to reason this will be his, "you deserved it all along" make-up award).

The other actors are great, too. Gyllenhaal, in particular, brings a heartbreaking emotional layer to the film as a small town music journalist with a small child. She's had a great year, first with her scene-stealing performance in the otherwise forgettable "Away We Go" and now here, in a role that lets her shine. She may get involved with this fuck-up, but she's a surprisingly strong characters and has to make decisions that break your heart but also make you cheer her on. Oh, and Farrell and Duvall are strong too.

Cooper, who is (shockingly) a first time director, has put together a marvelous little movie.

Its smallness is one of its largest assets, and grounds you in the emotional truth of these characters. With a truly remarkable performance at its center, and a novelistic interest in characters over stuff actually happening, "Crazy Heart" may meander, but man is it gripping. It's like a country western song you can't get out of your head. And one that you can't wait to hear again. [B+] — Drew Taylor

Review: 'The Lovely Bones' Is, Sadly, A Disaster

The Lovely Bones” is a film that asks the viewer to have faith. Mostly to have faith in the human spirit, but also in the sentimental transcending the supernatural, the power of familial love, the beauty in youth granted wisdom, and of the ability of the afterlife to streamline our discoveries about our outside world.

It also asks you to have faith in darkness, in irredeemable evil, in corruption and hate and the seemingly random designation of humanity that creates somehow being totally different than what destroys. Obviously, it’s a film at war with itself, “The Lovely Bones” being a fascinating study of contradictory philosophies not uncommon to viewers of last year’s “The Curious Case of Benjamin Button.” It’s not a positive comparison.

Susie Salmon is a typical '70s-era teen smothered by the love of her very typical household. She argues with mom and dad in between exploring her artistic endeavors, an intellectual curiosity obviously spilling over from her bibliophile of a mother. She’s a treasure, a sweetheart of a kid that, before the story kicks in, we immediately fall for, and a lot of that comes from young Saoirse Ronan (“Atonement”) who communicates with attitude and humor how she’s not a pushover, but rather an independent spirit locked in a young girl’s body.

Unfortunately, the story dictates that the life she brings to this story be snuffed out, a victim of local child killer George Harvey. In a bookish blond comb-over wig and clumsy mouthpiece, Stanley Tucci seems to be wearing a stereotypical child molester Halloween costume. He charms young Susie with his pretend-childlike wonder, and while we never know exactly what he does to her offscreen, we do see his actions result in Suzie’s dead body being placed in a burlap bag and ignored for years. During his scenes, it’s hard not to imagine Chris Hansen angrily building a time machine in his head.

With Susie’s murder, the story takes on a bifurcated structure. At home, we deal with the fallout, her mother and father (Rachel Weisz, Mark Wahlberg) coping in their own specific ways. Father Jack buries himself in case files, dead-set on investigating family histories and mental records to find the most accurate suspect, while mother Abigail… we’re not sure how she’s reacting, although she’s an emotional wreck. Jack tries to help her by bringing in Grandma Lynn (Susan Sarandon) and, hey, it’s time for a wacky boozing grandma montage! (and lord, (she looks like a makeup grotesque from one of Robert Aldrich's horror melodramas like, "What Ever Happened To Baby Jane?")

In the afterlife, we see Susie struggling to get a handle on what’s happened. Presumably from the source novel (though we are unfamiliar), the hook here is a fruitful one, the idea of coping with death when you are the victim. Susie goes through stages of mourning refracted by the afterlife, first unable to accept she’ll never return, and then blaming herself for what happened. Her burdens are compounded by the implicit notion that somehow, it’s her emotion that’s peeking through to the other side, subtly affecting events. We’re led to believe this comes from her failing to accept death, as it’s Susie’s flashes in the real world that lead her father and younger sister to believe that she might not be gone after all. But while the film seems geared towards her letting go of her life and accepting she’s part of a chain of life and death, what of a late third act moment that provides sloppy closure from what CGI implies is clearly her afterlife influence?

That moment ties into the question this film inadvertently asks: How much humanity is a filmmaker owed to his/her characters? Director Peter Jackson’s camera bestows love and affection towards the Salmons, showing a family testing each other’s resolve through tragedy, but never their love. Contrast that with George Harvey, who is seen devising and building traps for future young female pursuits, just the latest in an ongoing, unexplained murder spree. The film spends so much time with Harvey, but to what end? He’s given a hobby of building miniature houses, something that never comes into play during the film’s runtime except to suggest some sort of strand of arrested development. Otherwise, the camera captures him as it would a horror film monster. Tucci’s Harvey wouldn’t be at all out of place in a sleazy exploitation film, especially with the suspicious stings on the soundtrack during the moments where he overacts to break a sweat when it looks like, somehow, he may be caught. Jackson doesn’t like Harvey, in other words, and while none of us would condone murder, what’s the sense of stacking the deck against your story’s clear antagonist?

Lots of “The Lovely Bones” is like that — broad, simplistic, often garish. Jackson is in love with vertiginous dolly shots signifying motion and activity in every day events, his camera staging a family breakfast like the siege at Helm’s Deep. He's careful to use bright lights and flattering camera angles to illuminate the Salmon clan (particularly Wahlberg, surprisingly good) , while showing Harvey’s house as a place of constant darkness, shooting him with a forced perspective or even a dutch angle to illustrate his otherworldliness as if Tucci’s literal mustache-twirling performance doesn’t do the job enough. The film begins with the herky jerky kamikaze tone, but it’s easy to settle in as it becomes clear that Susie will eventually be in danger. Unfortunately, it stays pitched at an impossibly high level, even though the plot is filled with low-key digressions like Susie’s crush finding a new love or the arrival of Grandma Lynn (and, in all fairness, there’s never a good time for a wacky boozing grandma montage). This reaches its nadir when Jack, somehow tipped off by a CGI candle flame, runs after Harvey, into a cornfield with a baseball bat, when a random teen bumps into him and beats him into submission while a Brian Eno electric guitar wails triumphantly on the soundtrack (good music choices, as in great songs, but the execution throughout is largely terrible). In case you must know, Harvey leers at this in near-masturbatory glee, his face lit up by a flashlight like a kabuki mask.

Has Jackson spent too much time on Middle Earth and Skull Island that he no longer remembers what human interactions are like? Neither the world of the Salmons nor Harvey’s inner life reflect anything in reality, and while Wahlberg and Weisz are allowed to bring optimism and affection to their roles (and Sarandon some TV-level guff), Tucci is clearly a monster. The hope is that the CGI-loaded afterlife will be more to Jackson’s strengths, but that too is a candy-coated misfire, at best the embodiment of a lazy child’s imagination, at worst an elaborate pinball machine design. Like 'Benjamin Button,' a script about life framed through the eyes of a director obsessed with death, “The Lovely Bones” can never settle on a tone, and we never get to see any onscreen ideas take flight due to Jackson’s insistence on constant motion and activity, with occasionally mordant horror-movie touches, leading to a climax that wants to be everything to everyone — and isn’t it funny how movies that spend the longest time in incubation always seem the least-finished? (and that melodramatic This Mortail Coil cover of Jeff Buckley's "Song of the Siren" in the climax feels nauseating as if it's a parody of shampoo or tampon commercial; most of the songs featured in the script made the movie).

Peter Jackson remains a director of wonderful skill and imagination, but he hasn’t been genuinely exciting for a long time. We only somewhat appreciated the impressive technical craft of “Lord of the Rings,” and were apathetic about “King Kong” but we‘re always willing to give the inventive Kiwi genius a chance. “The Lovely Bones,” however, is simply an out-and-out misfire. [D+]

'Moon,' Carey Mulligan Big Winners At The British Independent Film Awards

The awards season is in full swing now, with the Gotham Awards and the National Board of Review hitting last week, and the Spirit Award nominations being announced. Last night, the British Independent Film Awards gave out their twelfth selection of winners. We looked at the nominations when they were announced a few months back, and the winners from last night's ceremony are below:

Best British Independent Film
"Moon"

Best Director
Andrea Arnold - "Fish Tank"


The Douglas Hickox Award (Best Debut Director)
Duncan Jones - "Moon"

Best Screenplay
Jesse Armstrong, Simon Blackwell, Armando Iannucci, Tony Roche - "In The Loop"

Best Actress
Carey Mulligan - "An Education"

Best Actor
Tom Hardy - "Bronson"

Best Supporting Actress
Anne-Marie Duff - "Nowhere Boy"

Best Supporting Actor
John Henshaw - "Looking for Eric"

Most Promising Newcomer
Katie Jarvis - "Fish Tank"

Best Achievement in Production
"Bunny and the Bull"

Raindance Award
"Down Terrace"

Best Technical Achievement
Greig Fraser - Cinematography - "Bright Star"

Best Documentary
"Mugabe and the White African"

Best British Short
"Love You More"

Best Foreign Film
"Let the Right One In"


The Richard Harris Award (For Outstanding Contribution to British Film)
Daniel Day-Lewis

The Variety Award
Sir Michael C
aine

The Special Jury Prize
Baz Bamigboye

All in all, it's a hard list to disagree with - Jones, Mulligan and Hardy, in particular, are well deserved winners. We'd quibble slightly with the supporting actor/actress choices — Anne-Marie Duff is a fine actress, but Kristin Scott-Thomas is very definitely the stand out in "Nowhere Boy," and, while it's nice to see veteran actor John Henshaw recognized, there were more deserving nominees in the category. Still, all in all, a strong year for independent British cinema, as the spreading of the wealth across several films suggests.

Andrew Garfield Leads Spike Jonze's Secret 'Robot Love Story' Short Film, 'I'm Here,' For Absolut Vodka

Spike Jonze certainly makes the most of his time.

On top of the release of his long-awaited adaptation of Maurice Sendak's "Where The Wild Things Are" this year, Jonze has also helmed an ad for Japanese communications company Softbank starring Brad Pitt, returned to acting in a British television pilot for David Cross and Will Arnett titled, "The Increasingly Poor Decisions Of Todd Margaret" and made a short film with rapper Kanye West called "We Were Once A Fairytale."

In addition to all that, the director still has his top secret "robot love story" short film which he completed earlier this year.
While details are being kept under wraps, what we do know is that the short centers on a romance between two robots, features the L.A. indie rockers Moonrats as a fake band called The Lost Trees led by David Kramer and reunites Jonze with his regular crew of collaborators including cinematographer Adam Kimmel (not Lance Bangs).

The Guardian now reports that the half-hour short
was made for Swedish alcohol company, Absolut Vodka, is officially titled "I'm Here" and stars up and coming Brit actor Andrew Garfield ("Boy A," "The Imaginarium Of Doctor Parnassus") who he met through fellow director Mark Romanek - Garfield stars in Romanek's upcoming thriller "Never Let Me Go."

The involvement of talent like Garfield certainly adds to our excitement for the project with hopes now his romantic counterpart, presuming he is one of the aforementioned robots, is just as great. What's Absolut's involvement? Hopefully they just paid for the short and we won't have to see too much product placement.

We assume, "I'm Here," will eventually see an online release, likely some time in the New Year.
UPDATE: According to Movieline, the short will lead next year's Sundance Film Festival shorts program alongside James Franco's Michael Shannon-led student film, an adaptation of Frank Dibart's poem "Herbert White."

Meanwhile, clips from "The Increasingly Poor Decisions Of Todd Margaret" have made their way online. Jonze has a starring role as well. One clip is below, another is over at YouTube and you can't be embedded, but check them out. Lots of F-bombs in the clip. You've been forewarned.

More Details on Jack Ryan Reboot; Jack Black Studies Cryptozoology

Coming Soon spoke to producer Mace Neufeld at the press conference for "Invictus," where he spilled the beans on the reboot of the 'Jack Ryan' franchise, set to star Chris Pine. The new film, currently being rewritten by Adam Cozad (behind the Black List action thriller "Dubai"), won't be based on an existing Tom Clancy novel, and will serve as a prequel, picking the character up on Wall Street, and following his entry into the CIA - Neufeld says "He's a teacher. He's a historian. He's a linguist. And he's really smart." All four of the Ryan films so far have been pretty good, but we don't quite see the value of the franchise - it's not like Ryan is a particularly compelling character, is he?

— We've been looking so long at this "Pictures of You," that we almost believe that it's real: The spec script by Joshua Friedlander was on the 2007 Black List, but hasn't made any progress towards development. Until now, that is, as "Youth in Revolt" producer David Permut has picked it up, and is intending to go into production next year. The story follows a teenage boy who finds a camera on a Florida beach, and who falls in love with a girl in the pictures.

— Illumination Entertainment, who are behind next year's animation "Despicable Me," have acquired a pitch from writer Jason Micallef, which Jack Black will produce, set in the world of cryptozoology - the study of mythical creatures like Bigfoot. Interestingly, Black will serve as a producer, and not provide a voice. Here's hoping it's closer to "Kung Fu Panda" than to "Shark Tale."

— Did you like "The Fast & The Furious?" Did you think the only way it could be better is if it had planes, instead of cars? Then you'll love "War Birds," an independent action movie set to film in Michigan next year. The story will follow a washed-out Air Force veteran who is now a pilot at airshows, who "gets pulled into the underground culture of illegal, real-life aerial combat." We really hope the script manages to explain how you keep enormous aerial dogfights like the one seen in this test clip for the movie 'underground'...

— "Superbad" and "Adventureland" director Greg Mottola is in London editing "Paul," and is the latest friend-of-Edgar-Wright to see some of "Scott Pilgrim Vs. The World." In fact, Wright completed his first cut last week, so Mottola has seen the whole thing. He tweeted, "Be very jealous of me. I've seen an entire cut of "Scott Pilgrim Vs. The World." Edgar Wright has made a classic (again)! It's amazing. I would say that Scott Pilgrim is the wittiest action movie you'll ever see, but that's just the half of it. Needless to say, Michael Cera is perfect. In fact, every single performance is incredible. You've got something special to look forward to... the filmmaking is so insanely good, I retired halfway through the movie." We're as jazzed about it as anyone else, but we think we're going to have to moderate our expectations a little, otherwise it risks turning into an indie-rock version of "Avatar"...

Charlie Hunnam Writes Hollywood's One Millionth Vampire Script, Wins A Prize!

Our feelings on the current glut of vampire movies in development are pretty clear at this point, but in case you feel we've been too ambiguous: we think they should stop. Let's have a couple of years off vampires (and zombies, for that matter), and make movies about, we don't know, mole-people or Yetis or something. Just because teenagers love "Twilight," it doesn't mean that they're going to see "Daybreakers," you know? Nevertheless, Summit are using their piles of gold from the success of "New Moon" to pick up the script "Vlad," a period actioner focusing on Dracula as a young prince. Brad Pitt is producing, through his Plan B Entertainment production company.

Interestingly, the script was a spec from British actor Charlie Hunnam, best known as the backflipping albino from "Cold Mountain" and as the lead on hit cable series "Sons of Anarchy" (or back in the day, the British student on Judd Apatow's "Undeclared") which just ended its second series. Hunnam's script has been developing quietly at Summit for a while, but a director's now been appointed in the shape of Anthony Mandler, a music-video helmer who's worked with Rihanna, The Killers and Jay-Z (his vaguely post-apocalyptic, Warriors-aping video for "Run This Town" can be seen below). Supposedly, Mandler put together a showreel that impressed executives at Summit, who are, inevitably, comparing him to Zack Snyder.

It's unclear how soon this'll head into production, or whether it's seen as a vehicle for either Pitt or Hunnam - we'd say that Pitt seems a little old for the role, but Hunnam probably wrote the script, as most actors who write do, in an attempt to generate material for himself. "Sons of Anarchy" has become something of a breakout hit, so it's not outside the realms of possibility that Summit will take a chance on him as a lead. We just wish it wasn't in a goddamn vampire movie.

12/06/2009

Weekend Box Office- When Does 'Avatar' Come Out Again?

The holiday movie season is about to become very busy, so the first weekend of December was looking like a weak sister for awhile now. Still, the beat goes on for "The Blind Side," which continued its improbable run by landing at #1 in its third week. The hooray-for-institutionalized-racism drama has been surging since a pretty good opening, but it probably owes its success to a wide-open marketplace and the diminishing returns of huge opener "The Twilight Saga: New Moon." "Blind Side" might stop short of $200 million if the legs drop out in coming weeks, but who knows? Maybe it'll become first choice for the most backwards of families in the coming weeks, because some people just want to find a docile, somewhat mute but physically intimidating black kid that they can heal with Christianity under their Christmas trees.

Don't weep for "New Moon," which is posting some massive week-to-week losses. I
t dropped 63% this weekend but still runs its total to $256 and change, and while the diehards already went, you'll bet your ass they'll see the flagging week seven box office and return to pump up the numbers, since if you're not Team Edward or Team Jacob, you're Team GTFO. Debuting at #3 was "Brothers," which registered a so-so opening. The ads appropriately made it look like a glum-fest, so Lionsgate should be happy with what they got, since no one wants to pay to see Spider-Man mope. Well, ok, at least not without some CGI shit swirling around him. Everything largely fell off this session, but "A Christmas Carol" continues to feel the holiday spirit. The film's at $115 million but, surprisingly, above the pace of "The Polar Express," which played for a very long time. Look out below, however, because those 3D screens are going to start going to "Avatar" big time.

"Armored" was a dump in less than 2000 theaters, debuting at #6, but with such a quiet weekend, why couldn't this be more of a competitor? It's interesting that Screen Gems was able to market the similarly straight-to-DVD-looking "Obsessed" to huge success earlier this year, but unless Beyonce Knowles and Idris Elba are huge box office draws (not really), we can't see one project being more glamorous than the other. It may boil down to niche markets split down the middle we're in the age of the female-centric blockbuster, with stuff like "Twilight" and the older-skewing "Julie and Julia" being looked at as huge moneymakers driven by female box office. While males remain a larger part of the market, there is a hunger for female-centric tentpoles, even if they aren't filled with explosions and CGI. While the fem
me-tentpole is still in its early stages (these formulas are hard to crack when most H'wood execs are men) the female niche film, something like "Obsessed," "The Time Traveler's Wife" or even "Precious," can still eke out a solid gross. The male blockbuster is alive and well, of course, but when's the last time a testosterone-heavy niche film has crossed over? In recent weeks, we've seen boy-centric genre films in "Ninja Assassin" and "Cirque du Freak" flop, while more neutral stuff like "Law Abiding Citizen" and "Couples Retreat" were designed to appeal to men and women and hit big. In other words, if it isn't a brand name blockbuster, are single guys going to show up? Is "Armored" one of the last of a dying breed? These problems could have been solved if they put Columbus Short on the poster without a shirt.

Speaking of dumps, Miramax put little effort into marketing "Everybody's Fine," and the DeNiro holiday greeting card of a movie flopped at #10. Could've been the apathetic title - gee, guys, why don't you just call it "Doin' OK"? In limited release, "Up In The Air" posted a week-best $77k per screen average on only fifteen screens for a stellar $1.2 million, great news for its further expansion. Not too many showed up for the thousand-screen launch of "Transylmania," however, the frat horror comedy scaring u
p $252k, an average of wait, really? $250 per screen. That's basically your grandma and all her friends. Meanwhile, there's some serious deflating on the indie market as far as "Precious," which tallied $2.3 million, and might be tapped out pretty soon. Some were forecasting $100 million for the film, but clearly they overestimated the box office appeal of Mo'Nique throwing television sets at babies. The film finishes the weekend out at $36 million, a big victory financially, but under the lofty expectations set so far. With the announcements of award winners in coming weeks, you might see an uptick in interest, but its likely they've already fulfilled the market for this film.

Lined up for its coming expansion, "The Princess And The Frog" again did smashing business on its two screens, tallying $372k per, while "The Road" pulled in $760k for the frame, losing almost half its impressive opening weekend. It's kind of amazing that "The Road" was supposed to go wide, was scaled back to 111 screens and then in it's second week of release it bumps up to all of 128 screens. Audiences are peeved and it feels like The Weinstein Company are releasing this one half-heartedly.

Meanwhile, "The Fantastic Mr. Fox" pulled in $1.4k per screen, t
he lowest per-screen average of any film on two thousand screens this week, and there were a lot. More people went to see the stillborn "Planet 51." Really, what kind of asshole are you for not seeing it?

1. The Blind Side- $20.4 million ($129 mil.)
2. New Moon - $15.7 million ($256 mil.)
3. Brothers- $9.7 million
4. A Christmas Carol- $7.5 million ($115 mil.)
5. Old Dogs- $6.9 million ($34 mil.)
6. Armored- $6.6 million
7. 2012- $6.6 million ($149 mil.)
8. Ninja Assassin- $5 million ($30 mil.)
9. Planet 51- $4.3 million ($34 mil.)
10. Everybody's Fine- $4 million

12/05/2009

American 'Death At A Funeral' Trailer Shows Remake To Be EXACTLY Like The Original

The American trailer for "Death At A Funeral," the remake to the British hit of 2007, has just surfaced. We're very much against the idea of Americans remaking recent foreign films, since the only thing they're changing in most instances is the language. Most recent foreign films that do appeal to American producers looking for remake material seem to be takeoffs of American concepts in the first place. Last year's French hit "Tell No One," which was paced like a very traditional American potboiler, was even inspired by a trashy American airport novel. Is it a surprise to know that American producers own the remake rights?

This practice lends itself to xenophobia, most Americans not wanting to experience ANY slice of a foreign culture no matter how you sell it, but the worst element of this is the prospect of American remakes of foreign films from English-speaking countries. Oh no, an accent! You'd think prize-winning playwright Neil LaBute would be able to inject something new into the proceedings, but this is also the LaBute who previously directed "Lakeview Terrace" and the remake of "The Wicker Man," so he clearly doesn't give a fuck. Case in point even the TRAILER for the new version opens with the same gag as the original's trailer.

The premise of the film involves a family getting back together for the death of the presumably-influential patriarch, a convergence of opposite forces bound to cause conflict. In the middle of all this, there's a new boyfriend invited who's been given far too many drugs (James Marsden, filling in for Alan Tudyk), an uncle with far too many bowel problems (Danny Glover subbing for Peter Vaughan) and a secret gay lover looking for blackmail cash (Peter Dinklage). Each part was beneath the original actor, and it looks like that's being preserved for the newer go-round, with the trailer spoiling Marsden ending up naked on a rooftop, Glover shitting on his nephew (lucky Tracy Morgan) and Dinklage REPRISING his role as the gay midget, who's scary because he's gay (ew!) and because he's small (haw haw!). We're stunned Dinklage needed the money so bad he would return to the most degrading role he's ever played AGAIN, but hey, that's the recession for you. We've included a peek of the actor trying to maintain his dignity in Hollywood below.

We urge you to not even bother with the original, which has a decent cast, but isn't even in the tradition of Richard Curtis' Brit farces, with gags that seem to have been excised from the worst of mainstream American sitcoms. This version features Chris Rock, Martin Lawrence, Zoe Saldana, Luke Wilson, Danny Glover, James Marsden, Tracy Morgan, Peter Dinklage, Loretta Devine, Columbus Short, Kevin Hart and Regina Hall and will be released February 2010, at which point all these actors are off doing something to forget they were involved.


Jeff Bridges Says 'Iron Man' Had 'No Script'

We've been going on several times about Jon Favreau and company shooting "Iron Man" and its sequel with no script whatsoever, but it's taken The Dude to confirm this interesting nugget, in spectacular detail. In a pretty engaging interview with In Contention about his Oscar vehicle "Crazy Heart," Jeff Bridges opens up about the studio's lackadaisical filmmaking methods.

Bridges says, “They had no script, man. They had an outline. We would show up for big scenes every day and we wouldn’t know what we were going to say. We would have to go into our trailer and work on this scene and call up writers on the phone, ‘You got any ideas?’ Meanwhile the crew is tapping their foot on the stage waiting for us to come on... You’ve got the suits from Marvel in the trailer with us saying, ‘No, you wouldn’t say that. You would think with a $200 million movie you’d have the shit together, but it was just the opposite. And the reason for that is because they get ahead of themselves. They have a release date before the script, ‘Oh, we’ll have the script before that time,’ and they don’t have their shit together."

Bridges isn't entirely that negative about the experience. Of Favreau, he says, "Jon dealt with it so well. It freaked me out. I was very anxious. I like to be prepared. I like to know my lines, man, that’s my school. Very prepared. That was very irritating, and then I just made this adjustment... So I said, ‘Oh, what we’re doing here, we’re making a $200 million student film. We’re all just fuckin’ around! We’re pla
yin’. Oh, great!’ That took all the pressure off. ‘Oh, just jam, man, just play.’ And it turned out great!”

This confirms what most of us suspected about these movies, that Marvel is indeed flying by the seat of their pants. We know that the credit for the screenplay, shared by Mark Fergus, Hawk Ostby, Art Marcum and Matt Holloway, was tenuous, but we didn't know it was so bad that, according to the interview, they "would literally act out sequences during primitive rehearsals, Downey taking on Bridges’s role and vice versa, to find and essentially improvise their way to full scenes." How do you run a movie set and have no one responsible for what's going to be coming out of Jeff Bridges' mouth? Major movie sets are an embarrassment of excess you should see some of the craft service set-ups we've seen but how is there not a single person around who can write comic book dialogue for Iron Man and Iron Monger? Hell, if they scoured the internet, they'd find Marvel superfans who would pay Marvel for that opportunity. And they probably wouldn't be half-bad.

At least Bridges is positive about the experience, but it really sounds like some of the handlers on these sets are imbeciles. He's old enough to know not to badmouth the wrong people, so its hard to say if his praise for Favreau is real or not, but he does end that part of the interview by claiming Marvel execs told him, “It’s just a comic book. Maybe we’ll bring you back.” Just a comic book? We're sorry, but are Marvel Studio executives busy producing Holocaust documentaries in their spare time? If they're not going to view their own movies as substantial, why should we?

To end on a positive note, the interview with Bridges, which details his entire career, is really fucking great, even for an Oscar soft-sell piece. Click here to read about his thoughts on "Starman," the possibility of reuniting with Peter Bogdanovich, and The Dude's own pot habits.

12/04/2009

Bennett Miller Plays 'Moneyball'

Variety reports that "Capote" director Bennett Miller has jumped onboard Sony's struggling "Moneyball" project, and it looks like it's full steam ahead for the troubled production. We broke the story of Miller's involvement around a month ago, and Variety also confirms what we heard about Marc Webb ("500 Days of Summer") being in consideration to direct the script that has gone through hundreds of revisions from Aaron Sorkin and Steve Zallian, with more budget-centric edits on the way.

Most projects are interesting because of how they mutate over time, and "Moneyball" is something we're going to guess will be totally different from its inception point as a Steven Soderbergh effort. As we've reported plenty of times before, Soderbergh had completed $10 million worth of pre-production before he departed the project, including one-on-one interview footage with ballplayers to blur the line between actors and athletes. Sony head Amy Pascal pulled the plug when she realized Soderbergh was adapting a nonfiction statistics book with the same sensibilities he brought to "Full Frontal," necessitating a major change in approach right before shooting.

The process hasn't been helped by the looming specter of Major League Baseball approval, which reportedly carped about an earlier draft that depicted protagonist Billy Beane as a swinging bachelor when the real life general manager/minority owner of the Oakland A's is a married man (and like most sports personalities, probably has a pretty conservative, boring home/sex life not conducive to film). Soderbergh's near-improvisational set-up, mixing real athletes with actors, allowing for certain creative flexibility, probably didn't help the idea that this was a worthwhile endeavor for MLB.


Variety's synopsis about the current project also gives us pause, stating "Moneyball" is about how Beane "defied conventional wisdom and even his own scouts by fielding a baseball team of castoffs to create the ultimate underdogs en route to one of the most unlikely winning streaks in the history of professional sports." Does this mean Sony is possibly turning the film into a more conventional sports story? Everyone knows that Oakland didn't really reel off that many winning streaks, and if anything, the theory of Moneyball made them... competitive. A few playoffs appearances at most. It can be argued that last offseason after years of failure with the Moneyball model of success, Beane abandoned the approach and went all in to acquire a major superstar bat, and that backfired too. In other words, this is a story of some mild success followed by economically-feasible failure. Are we running out of sports stories to adapt that we need to tell the inspirational sports tales of the general manager who fielded a so-so group of underdogs, the guy who lived his dream to pitch 21 innings for a last place team, and the inspirational hero who recorded one reception and two fumble recoveries in three years of pro ball?

One of the many surprises about the story is that star Brad Pitt remains on-board. He's previously gained notoriety for exiting projects in a huff, famously leaving "Almost Famous," "The Departed," "The Fountain" and "State of Play" in the lurch. How he's stayed on is a mystery, though we wonder if he'll humor the ongoing rewrites and budgetary changes to accommodate what the studio patronizingly assumes is the limited bankability of Miller's ideas.

Not Over? Matt Damon Still Thinks Paul Greengrass Will Return To 'Bourne 4' One Day

Earlier this week, we broke the news that Paul Greengrass had walked away from the fourth installment of the lucrative Bourne franchise. The key sticking point seemed to be that Universal went out and had gotten a second script written without informing Greengrass (and to the one or two writers who continue not to acknowledge our existence on this story, yes scripts do exist).

Earlier today, we speculated on who might be a good fit to fill in the director's chair but that's just wishful thinking, because in a recent interview with Matt Damon he confirmed he won't do the next Bourne film without Greengrass. Speaking at a press junket for "Invictus" Damon confirmed Greengrass' exit but left the door open saying he might return:

How does the departure of Paul [Greengrass] influence the 4th Bourne movie?

MATT DAMON: I’ll just wait for him and when he wants to do one, we’ll do it.
Are you saying it’s Greengrass or no Bourne?

DAMON: Yeah, I’ve always said that. But I think it will happen down the road. We just don’t have a [ready] script right now.

So what does this mean? It's possibly less Greengrass quitting and more him showing the studio he's got them by the balls as Damon will wait for him. Echoing what we wrote in our original report saying that this move might simply be temporary, Damon thinks Greeengrass will eventually come back. "Paul’s got to go to work, you know? He’s ready to do another job, and [Bourne] wasn’t the right job now," Damon told EW, hinting at Greengrass' next move because the 'Bourne' scripts are ready. "I get it. I wouldn’t do it without him but I don’t feel like he’s done with it totally. I think he’d change his mind if a good script came along. If there was a great Bourne idea, he would love to do it. It’s a big part of his life, too. We’re still going to keep working together — and hopefully on another Bourne movie too."

Greengrass' exit means that he's going to leverage his ties to Damon in order to get the script that he wants. Damon's comment that "we don't have a script right now" seem to say that he's not even going to bother reading it unless Greengrass is happy with it first. Universal had better start making nice with Greengrass.

As for Universal, they don't want to drag this out too long. Having been sold this week by GE to Comcast, their new owners probably don't want one of the studio's most valuable franchises to fall by the wayside. That said, if the hugely expensive "Green Zone" doesn't perform, Greengrass might have a bunch of crow to eat if he wants back in to the Bourne series. Either way though, it sounds like the director either has found a new project, we've already hinted at one biopic that's a possibility, or he's just dangling that in front of Universal as a warning.

Related Posts with Thumbnails