Who? Couch that for a second, let's go back to the casting choices rumored for Marvel's "The First Avenger: Captain America" which were leaked yesterday.
Most fanboys and even semi-interested parties either shrugged, groaned or went, "huh?" went it came to the relatively unknown, untested names being thrown around as the final contenders. They basically break down into two groups. John Krasinski of NBC's "The Office" sitcom and everyone else — the lesser-known pretty boys: Chace Crawford, Garrett Hedlund ("Tron Legacy"), Mike Vogel ("Cloverfield"), Scott Porter ("Friday Night Lights"), Patrick Flueger ("The 4400") and Michael Cassidy ("Smallville"). Why these choices? Because Marvel's on a tight budget for "Captain America" and they're basically going to lowball their actors and pay them a near scale wage for at least picture one so they can spend the rest of their money on authentic locations (Europe), sets and presumably some special effects.
Why is Krasinski being touted for this role at all? He's the one the choice that made everyone go, "him?," but because he's the oldest looking of the bunch and can act (though seems untested in drama so far) he does make some sense. The age factor is important. One day Captain American has to be the leader of The Avengers alongside people like Robert Downey Jr. He has to be his peer, his equal. Not some snot-nosed kid who RDJ could probably collapse with one furtive glance or patterned stare. Plus Krasinski is extremely tall which could give him the presence needed if he could bulk up in time (though the character is supposed to be lanky, weak, etc. which means Krasinski could fit the bill). But will anyone buy that?
Why are the rest of these young, pretty boys being considered at all? Because they are young, handsome (bring in that "Twilight" girl crowd if you hire someone dreamy enough) and most importantly they're all cheap. But any of them side-by-side with Robert Downey Jr. or even giving him orders? The thought seems laughable. Sure Chris Hemsworth —who was cast as "Thor" — is essentially unknown, but he's big, looks the part and it's easy to see why he could play an imposing character like the Asgardian hero. "Captain America" might be supposedly a weakling at first, but shouldn't Marvel thinking end-game, as the great American Marvel hero, who pretty much looks like the apotheosis of a big, brawny, muscular NFL quarterback in his prime? None of those kids fit the bill. Also, they're essentially stuck in teen kid roles. Will they actually feel and look like an adult?
So we offer Marvel a solution. Someone who is not a boy (he's 35), someone who is attractive, can look, play and act intense, can actually act and will probably be in the film that wins the Best Picture at this year's Academy Awards: Brian Geraghty of "The Hurt Locker." Geraghty has the look and has the chops and he holds his own in that film alongside the Oscar-nominated Jeremy Renner, and the celebrated Anthony Mackie (who is one hell of an actor). Geraghty has also earned the respect of his peers and is actually good friends with people like Renner and Sam Rockwell — they admire his work and know that he has that something that's just waiting to be tapped by Hollywood. Lastly, Geraghty isn't expensive and he'd likely see the role as a great opportunity.
See, we're looking at it like, if you hire Geraghty, you get a relatively serious film which (like "The Hurt Locker"), can be entertaining as well. It would be a win-win for everyone. But since Marvel already made the bone-headed move of hiring hack Joe Johnston ("The Wolfman" which was just raked over the coals by any respectable critic and dreck like "Jurassic Park III"), we're probably going to see something more akin to "Daredevil," "Ghost Rider, "Fantastic Four" or one of the many major Marvel flubs from the aughts during the era when only a few directors could properly nail a comic book film. Mark our words, if Johnston and Marvel don't hire right, "The First Avenger: Captain America" will be Marvel's first major misstep on the road to "The Avengers" film and will trip up the series. They survived the minor misstep that was "Louis Leterrier's "The Incredible Hulk" (mostly because of Ed Norton) but can they afford another? Choose wisely, or face the wrath of fans and the box-office.
Update: This is amusing. Movieline actually asked Geraghty in a recent interview if he saw this piece or at least was aware that we were campaigning for him. Naturally, he hadn't read it and wasn't aware, but said that one of his friends tested for the part. Not that having little knowledge of a super hero character precludes you from taking the part, but it definitely sounds like Hollywood isn't listening to us. Shocker.
2/25/2010
For Your Consideration: Brian Geraghty As 'Captain America'
Posted by
Rodrigo
at
1:03 PM
Labels: Anthony Mackie, Brian Geraghty, Captain America, Jeremy Renner, Joe Johnston, John Krasinski, Marvel Studios, The First Avenger: Captain America, The Hurt Locker
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
27 comments:
He may be too old now, but at one time, Dennis Quaid would have owned this role.
John Hamm. All the way.
Get Mackie as Black Panther and Renner as Hawkeye to join him in The Avengers.
But seriously, don't think Geraghty stands a chance. They're looking for a square-jawed type of actor, a more all-American look.
Chris Pine would've been good, too expensive for them now though.
Lee Pace. Or Ben Foster. Make this happen, Marvel. $300k is a joke to any serious actor willing to take on this role.
Don't ever say you're not a geek site.
Why because we have a thoughtful approach to geek films and we can give tips to those people?
I think this is actually a really good idea. This guy has a good look for the role and obviously has the acting chops. Comic book movies have changed man, I don't think they can get away with just throwing out pretty kids with no talent anymore. But, who knows?
Although, they could just be kind of mindlessly producing this movie and once the Avengers movie comes out just advertise the hell out of the Iron Man (RDJ), Hulk (Ed Norton - ?), and Nick Fury (Sam Jackson) combo.
Hahaha! Yeah I'm sure they're going to listen to your "tips" on casting when you act like you're too high brow to give a shit about "geek" movies and all of a sudden want to have a say in them. (Not that any non-geek property would listen to your little blogger account casting suggestions either.)
How cute. Why don't you just come out of the closet already and admit you like comic books and/or their films.
what's awesome is that this one post contains 12,000 times as much thought and consideration as will go into shitting out this latest comic book movie product
Derf Nurbleburger is actually the best name for this kind of trolling dipshit I've seen lately.
/Though comic book movies and certainly all things that will ever be related to 'Captain America' suck shit out of a capybara's asshole, so you really should stop reporting on this crap unless a respectable filmmaker or actor is circling one.
Thank you, Joseph, but if you look at the content of my post you'll see that I have a very valid point. Simply pointing out a hypocrisy on the part of the writer(s) in question on this blog. You can't have it both ways. If you're going to condescend about shit like this movie and then all of a sudden say "I HAVE A CASTING SUGGESTION" then, well, you're a hypocrite. Plain and simple.
To be fair to you, though...okay my second post was a bit trollish, but it was in the spirit of further jabbing at them and having a bit of fun. Cheap shot though, you're right.
Derf Nurbleburger is right on this one, pal.
I'll add that I say this from the perspective of someone who doesn't give half a shit about a Captain America movie. And I would agree that most comic book movies have been forgettable and pedestrian at best.
It's still annoying that the writers of the site would be such assholes about it and then go further and feign a lack of interest until a bunch of snoozer names get announced. Then all of a sudden they're like "NO WAIT! WE HAVE A BETTER IDEA!" It's pathetic. Also pathetic that they think there's a snowball's chance in hell that their site is taken seriously enough by the industry that their opinion will matter.
Hey Derf, stop being a hypocrite yourself and instead of hanging out in the comments section of a "pathetic" site like ours where the writers are "assholes" go surf somewhere else.
"They survived the minor misstep that was "Louis Leterrier's "The Incredible Hulk" (mostly because of Ed Norton)". This statement was a misstep considering The Incredible Hulk was a great comic adaptation and Norton was a great Bruce Banner on screen. I find more and more stupid statements on these posts each week.
You guys are the ones with the highfalutin holier than thou stance on everything. Comment sections aren't only to kiss your ass and agree with you. It doesn't make somebody who comes to your site via links elsewhere a hypocrite to criticize the way this site writes.
You guys aren't untalented writers, you'd just be better off with an attitude adjustment and less snarkiness and pretension, that's all. *shrug*
And it IS pathetic for a blog to think that a studio is going to listen to a blogger, on a tentpole picture no less!
I agree with Derf. The writers here do come off as total stuck up jerks that think they are better than everyone else.
So please explain to me what was wrong with The Incredible Hulk.
300k is a joke? Spoiled idiots have no idea how to live life and not take advantage of everything and everyone around them. I think this site is a great example of what's wrong with people these days.
Believe it or not, studios do care what is being said online, otherwise, they wouldn't cater their marketing to the very blog community many here are saying they ignore.
"300k is a joke? Spoiled idiots have no idea how to live life and not take advantage of everything and everyone around them. I think this site is a great example of what's wrong with people these days."
I'll only say that you probably don't realize that the actor doesn't see all of that 300K. They have to pay out 10% to their agent, 10% to their manager (if not more), publicist, attorney, (if in LA) city business tax, and state and federal. Then they pay out of pocket trainers (especially for an action film) and many other business related expenses. So yeah, after all that, 300K isn't that much. Which is why many working actors (who don't have shows in syndication or can ask millions and not work for scale) still live in apartments.
And no, I'm not an actor.
Sam Worthington would be great here!
Yes, bizarrely, Sam Worthington would rule in this movie. The world needs a decisive but chill Captain America
If we only wrote about worthwhile movies, we would have an empty site.
Also, Derf sounds like my mom.
I'll employ my real blog account now.
"Believe it or not, studios do care what is being said online, otherwise, they wouldn't cater their marketing to the very blog community many here are saying they ignore."
They only care to exploit you for exposure. They are not going to listen to a blogger on a casting decision of a tentpole picture that has to be approved by a committee of the creative principles of the project, the suits, and that will represent their shareholders. Don't be naive.
Derf, your insistence that (some) bloggers and fans don't count is naive - at one point they had no say, but the internet has changed that. I've worked at these studios. I know how they think. Comic Con is an example of how they cater to these people (while taking their money). The casting of Jackie Earle Hailey in the Watchmen was the result of fans insistence on top of just good casting. That's one example.
I could really care less about how much the studios listen to geek fans, and you're right that they don't listen to them always, but you need to understand how the system works before speaking on it. If they piss the geek fans off, they don't make as many millions. Do the bloggers and fans have final say - hell fuck no. But they do have an influence. Does this blog? Who knows and who cares.
Also, I just got off the phone with Paramount. They have taken my suggestion to cast Kurt Russell in everything. So there.
Amusing. Check the update in the story above. Movieline asked Geraghty if he was aware some people were campaigning for him to take the role.
Also, would we rather have Geraghty stick to real, non-silly films? Hell yes. But do we think he's deserving of more recognition and should get more parts, yes?
This is why we're campaigning for him to take Captain America. So that movie ain't shit in the end, but hell if he can get successful otherwise, we'd be ok with that too.
It's not like we're mad invested in Captain America to the guy who says don't call yourself a geek site.
It's just clear that an adult, not a boy should play this part. And Geraghty is a talented person who looks the part and could do it (and most importantly, would probably do it for that kind of money as he's still coming up). He's great though. A terrific actor.
Post a Comment