It looks like movement on "The Strangers 2" is starting to begin again after shooting, which was supposed to take place in September of last year, never actually got started. Bloody Disgusting is reporting that Liv Tyler is a "lock" to return, reprising her role as Kristen McKay. Those who have seen the first may find that surprising.
It's been two years since the original's release, and in that time we've managed to almost completely forget about it. That's not to say it doesn't have its fans, but this writer in particular found it had an absence of thrills. The call for a sequel makes sense from a business standpoint. The first was made on the cheap for $10 million, and ended up earning over $80 million worldwide. But, from a story standpoint though, "The Strangers" doesn't exactly scream franchise.
5 comments:
She dies in the first one though, didn't she?
No, no, she doesn't die. She survives to scare the hell out of some neighbor kids.
I liked it better when it was called Funny Games
This is one of the best horror films of the decade. You're all on crack. It hasn't been a major decade for horror, but this along with "Wolf Creek" evidence a humanist streek sorely lacking in the "Saw" age. The opening 20 minutes of 'Strangers' is achingly sad, so that when the carnage begins, the stakes-- our investment in these characters-- are actually there. What's more, Bertino has serious chops as a genre director-- check his favoring of subtle scares (see: the 'Stranger enters the background scene') over cheap jump-n-thrills. He's no Carpenter or Hooper yet, but this is as solid a horror debut as any we saw in the Aughts. Recognize.
Why doesnt anyone mention that this is a remake from the french/romanian film "ils"
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0465203/
America. like. fuck you.
Post a Comment